An Indian Shame in Professionalism

The worrying saga of India’s preparedness for 2010 Commonwealth Games at New Delhi reached a new low few days back when the President of Commonwealth Games Federation (CGF) Michael Fennell announced that the Games was heading for “partial failure” and decided to setup a special monitoring panel with international experts to oversee preparations on a monthly basis for the rest of the year.

Why this is a big slap on India’s image as a professionally reliable nation is because this is the first time ever in the history of Commonwealth Games when such a step has been taken. Apparently, the only other instance that comes close to this was the case of 1982 Asian Games when a similar monitoring panel was setup. Guess what, this was the Delhi Asian Games! Clearly, some things in India never change.

Subroto Bagchi’s latest book “The Professional” does a great job of defining what being a professional really means. It says:

First and foremost a professional is a person who can self-certify completion of a task and can work unsupervised. If somebody else is required to certify that this task needs a particular standard then you are not a professional. This is a very small, but very subtle and important, distinction between being competent and being a professional.

Now apply this definition to all the monitoring going on with the Commonwealth Games. Lets begin with the latest one to join the group, the special monitoring panel setup by Michael Fennel out of utter frustration to trust his Indian counterparts.

Countering this development, the Games Organizing Committee chairman Suresh Kalmadi says “We don't want multiplicity of agencies, there are already agencies, including the Co-ordination Commission, which are monitoring the Games preparations”. Notice the words “there are already agencies, including the…”, clearly acknowledging that more than one group is monitoring the same project.

Now since that doesn’t sound like enough monitoring, Chief Minister Shiela Dikshit asks all her ministerial colleagues to regularly inspect various project sites and do the needful to ensure that all the projects are completed well ahead of the deadline. I wonder how on earth can all ministers together get into the act of ensuring timely project completion? Another example of “everybody’s responsibility and nobody’s accountability” syndrome so frequently seen in Government projects.

One would assume that this is enough of an overdose of monitoring. But wait, here comes the best. Enter the Sports Minister M.S.Gill and along with him the only man India can trust, Dr Manmohan Singh. Gill says, “The Prime Minister takes meetings regularly and has given the Group of Ministers under Jaipal Reddy the mandate to ensure that we are ready and complete for the Games”. Note the statement carefully “… Group of Ministers under…”. So half of Union Government has joined in the act as well.

What does one glean out of all this?

First, the easiest way to show you bother about the Commonwealth Games is to join in the act of monitoring it. Little doubt that the BJP has raised a demand that the PM appoint yet another Monitoring Committee, which can have members from different walks of life. A novel idea I think, perhaps it can take the added responsibility of ensuring that all the other monitoring groups are doing their monitoring jobs well.

Second, it shows an utter lack of faith in the abilities of those who are meant to deliver the Games in the first place. Clearly, Suresh Kalmadi has been caught in the act and he doesn’t mind showing off his frustration in pictures like the one above.

But most importantly and most unfortunately, this significantly compromises India’s image as a professionally competent nation. This at a time when China has pulled off the grandest Olympics ever and Brazil has clinched the 2016 Olympics from the jaws of US. It shows that not only are we quite far from achieving our targets for 2010 Commonwealth Games in a professional manner, but few of our public leaders even understand Bagchi’s golden definition of what being a professional really means.